Urs Liska <li...@openlilylib.org> writes: > Am 11.07.2018 um 11:55 schrieb David Kastrup: >> Urs Liska <li...@openlilylib.org> writes: >> >>> Am 10.07.2018 um 19:48 schrieb Urs Liska: >>>> This seems to confirm that I should *not* break out of the for-each >>>> loop that iterates over all-grobs in process-acknowledged. >>>> >>>> Does that mean that resetting the all-grobs list in >>>> start-translation-timestep is the right approach# >>> It's obviously not: while it reliably reduces processing time to what >>> it should be it equally reliably misses all annotations except on the >>> very first timestep. >> Which is not the problem of resetting all-grobs in >> start-translation-timestep but the asinine clearing of all-grobs inside >> of the loop. > > I either don't understand or partially disagree. > While I see now how clearing the list inside the loop causes a problem > I don't see how it produces the behaviour I observe.
>> But it seems like you may be much better off just hooking into the Score >> level process-acknowledged phase. You are, after all, doing a global >> kind of operation here. > > Well, except that I need to access each grob context's name and id (as > discussed in the other thread). Nobody forces you to only store the grob but not its originating context. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
