Sorry for the confusion! Taking another look at Yuval's second example,
the simple explanation is of course that he doesn't use the \\ feature
at all. In fact,
<< {\voiceOne r1-"voiceOne"} >>
does not create any new context at all, it's actually equivalent to
\voiceOne r1-"voiceOne"Yuval, consider the following example:
\context Voice = main {
c1^"In the main voice"
<<{ c1^"Still in the main voice" }
\new Voice{c1^"A newly created second voice"} >>
c1^"Again, still in the main voice"
}/Mats
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hackers: Is my guess below correct? In that case, wouldn't it be better to change the routine that invents new context identifiers so it never gives the names "1", ..., "4"?
"1" to "4" are only assigned by << \\ >> . Default names are either empty or "\new" (for \new Contexts)
-- ============================================= Mats Bengtsson Signal Processing Signals, Sensors and Systems Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Sweden Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe =============================================
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
