I thank you for the kind help and being to the point with a solution.
You're a good competent person and I appreciate it.
On 2018-08-07 15:07, ma...@masonhock.com wrote:
On 08/07, liebre...@grossmann-venter.com wrote:
The problem has been solved by Mason
The problem was pretty much entirely solved by David N. I'm glad that
the very minor change I made got it closer to what you need, but you
should thank him for writing the excellent \include.
Sorry for getting the thread off-topic by bringing up the license.
David K is correct that it was notrelevant to my point. What I should
have said is that the snippet can be tweaked for your use case, and
that this doesn't require criticism of something that has been shared
with you that was written with a different case in mind. That's all.
Best,
Mason
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
