On 8/25/2018 6:52 PM, Trevor Bača wrote:
Hey Ben,
When you're using markup as dynamics, don't you find that you're
unable to include those constructs in hairpins?
I went through a period where I was using straight-up text for
dynamics like you're mentioning. But the hairpin limitation moved me
towards make-dynamic-script. It's great. The other big benefit being
that indications that are made with make-dynamic-script align
(vertically) with all of Lily's other native dynamics.
I've wound up with house set of dynamic indications, too, like Andrew
was mentioning:
https://github.com/trevorbaca/baca/blob/master/lilypond/baca-dynamics.ily
Have at them if you go the make-dynamic-script way.
Trevor.
Trevor,
Thank you! I really hadn't considered how hairpins would be impacted
like that. I've been looking into the make-scripts approach now this
weekend and I'm seeing the power and benefits for sure.
Thanks for that house set, it gives me some great ideas on how to
structure my own! :)
Ben
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
