Urs Liska-3 wrote > Now that there seems to be a certain common understanding of my initial > idea, may I repeat my request for someone to provide a suitable default > sample document? > Coming up with a score that provides representative details with as > little content as possible does require some creativity, and it would be > a good idea if someone else deals with that so I can spend my time with > the coding itself.
Anyone motivated? https://curatingsubjects.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/79b.gif Joke apart, would you think possible/interesting to have small excerpts in the window preview and options to select a musical time or style in a tab which will propose different scores? One can then typeset an excerpt of a renaissance, baroque, classical, romantic, xxth, etc... score, which all combined would represent nearly all the interesting glyphs. For some fonts, musical context is important. The same idea was used here: https://elbsound.studio/music-font-comparison.php?font=Aloisen%20New -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
