I run into this regularly as well, and have been resigned to using rhPartOne, rhPartTwo, rhPartThree
or rhPartA, rhPartB, rhPartC I appreciate hearing about "rh1" and \"rh1". That seems reasonable, albeit ugly. Thanks for that. rh.1 would be preferable, but does not work as of 2.18.2. -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
