No problem. Thank you Jan-Peter.

On Tue., 16 Oct. 2018, 6:49 pm Jan-Peter Voigt, <jp.vo...@gmx.de> wrote:

> Hi Craig,
>
> I merged to master, but added a comment, that the names of the option
> and the file will change, like Urs and I discussed.
>
> This change shall be integrated soon, but right now I have to do some
> other jobs with higher priority.
>
> Jan-Peter
>
>
> Am 15.10.2018 um 22:00 schrieb Craig Dabelstein:
> > The new branch worked perfectly for me Jan-Peter.
> >
> > Craig
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 at 21:53, Craig Dabelstein
> > <craig.dabelst...@gmail.com <mailto:craig.dabelst...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     You two are amazing. I don't know where any of us would be without
> you.
> >
> >     Craig
> >
> >     On Mon., 15 Oct. 2018, 7:19 pm Jan-Peter Voigt, <jp.vo...@gmx.de
> >     <mailto:jp.vo...@gmx.de>> wrote:
> >
> >         Am 15.10.2018 um 11:13 schrieb Urs Liska:
> >         >
> >         >
> >         > Am 15.10.2018 um 11:07 schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt:
> >         >> Hi Urs,
> >         >>
> >         >> I combine the answers:
> >         >> The *.edition.log file might be named differently - not .log
> >         - as this
> >         >> file has a purpose outside the debug-log realm. And this is
> >         the reason
> >         >> I'd vote against writing the edition-context-information in a
> >         global log
> >         >> file.
> >         >
> >         > Yes, that points in the right direction. In that sense the EE
> >         "log" is
> >         > comparable to scholarLY's export files.
> >         >
> >         >> But for all debug-logs piping them into one (optional) files
> >         makes
> >         >> absolutely sense. How this file should be formatted is
> >         another question.
> >         >> And sometimes it is helpful if the log is written before Lily
> >         crashes
> >         >> ;-) so it might be worth writing immediatly.
> >         >
> >         > That's also true, and I had thought about this. But with your
> >         previous
> >         > comment we can solve the issue. If we're separating package
> >         specific
> >         > export files from traditional logs the logs don't have to be
> >         sectioned.
> >         > So we can format them similarly to usual log files, have a
> package
> >         > identifier at the beginning of each entry and simply write
> >         them out
> >         > immediately.
> >         >
> >         > And if I think of it, most of that is already implemented in
> >         oll-core.
> >         > There we have the functions  oll:log, oll:debug, oll:warn
> >         etc., combined
> >         > with the possibility to set the log-level. The only things
> >         we'd need is
> >         > the option to write the log or not, and the tagging of
> >         messages with the
> >         > package prefix.
> >         >
> >         > So I suggest you rename both the export filename and the
> >         option in the
> >         > EE, and we'll do the other thing separately.
> >         > OK I'll do that later and will think about the edition-context
> >         file
> >         structure. The paths shall be copyable ...
> >
> >         Jan-Peter
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Craig Dabelstein*
> > Maxime's Music
> > craig.dabelst...@gmail.com <mailto:craig.dabelst...@gmail.com>
> > /http://maximesmusic.com/
>
>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to