On Wed, 2018-11-14 at 16:39 +1100, Vaughan McAlley wrote: > On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 at 14:26, Chad Linsley <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 for a cross-platform of LilyQuick! > > > > In fact, would there be any interest in including it in Denemo
No, I think there would be no point in including it in Denemo since it is already there (*) (if you press a duration key and play a note you get the note at that duration, and if you play further notes they are entered at that duration), and what's more in Denemo you can press several duration keys in succession and *then* play the notes and the notes are entered with the durations you assigned. In addition you can enter dotted rhythms in two keystrokes and triplets in three, and with all of these you can enter any slurs simultaneously by holding down the control key while entering the duration key. This and half-a-dozen other refinements mean you can enter LilyPond code at several times the speed of any other method available in any other program, commercial or free. What hasn't been developed much in Denemo is a slick way of updating the resulting .ly file - it could be done trivially by scripting a continuous re-write on change in Scheme, but almost everyone using Denemo just lets Denemo run LilyPond for them and take the PDF output. Richard Shann (*) well, not with exactly the same keypress assignments, though that could be done by the end-user, as the keypress assignments are under the users' control in Denemo. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
