Thanks for working on this. Please let me know when and how to get it. Keizen they/them
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 2:09 AM Thomas Morley <[email protected]> wrote: > Am Mi., 14. Nov. 2018 um 11:04 Uhr schrieb David Kastrup <[email protected]>: > > > > Thomas Morley <[email protected]> writes: > > > > > I'm not convinced about below, but for the record: > > > > > > One could give the key-function a string-argument, or probably a symbol > > > And react on the input, like > > > > > > (case <input> > > > (("major") major) > > > ... > > > (else (ly:error/warning "message")) > > > > > > Obviously pseudo-code (I'm in a hurry), but I hope the proposal is > made clear. > > > Also, would need a convert-rule. > > > > That would leave us with the same situation we had for a long time > > regarding engravers: the built-in scales would be a privileged class and > > you'd need to have some registration mechanism to elevate user-defined > > scales. > > > > I usually lean towards making things work "as expected" but I don't > > really think it would be doing us favors here. > > > > -- > > David Kastrup > > As said, I'm not convinced about this myself, but I thought the (at > least) thinkable alternative should have been discussed. > This happened now. ;) > > My very first thought about the problem was to use number-pair-list? > So I'm fine with your patch. > > Cheers, > Harm >
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
