See also on Wikipedia for a comparison: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_scorewriters
On 20/11/18 22:03, Shane Brandes wrote: > Is there anything on that list that Lilypond doesn't do? What do they > mean by jazz articulations? > > -Shane > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 3:04 PM David Bellows <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Urs, >> >>> I think it would be good to add our stuff to the chart (not necessarily >>> much to the comments section). >> >> If the owner of the spreadsheet allows it, then definitely. I don't >> know them personally so I don't know how they feel about that. I >> suppose we could create our own version if they do not agree. I'm one >> of the mods in that sub so I'll be making the chart a permanent link >> in the sub so either way would work (and obviously we can link to it >> from anywhere else we'd like). >> >>> not only check the given items with yes/no but also freely add to the list >> >> I agree. The OP did ask for omissions/corrections so I would think >> these (and others) would apply. >> >>> find a way to plug the "programmability" aspect (vs. applying plugins >>> after-the-fact), with things like complete extensibility with >>> syntactical means, conditional layout per engraving target ... (Maybe >>> this would even warrant a new tab in the sheet) >> >> One of Lilypond's biggest strengths! Working out meaningful/useful >> parallels with the other programs would be the issue, I'm guessing? >> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 11:50 AM David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Karlin High <[email protected]> writes: >>> >>>> On 11/20/2018 12:38 PM, David Bellows wrote: >>>>> Over in the /r/composer sub on Reddit, a user put together a chart >>>>> listing features of Musescore, Sibelius and Dorico. >>>> >>>> I remember seeing some past work done with comparing LilyPond to other >>>> software. >>>> >>>> <https://github.com/engraving-challenges/main> >>>> <https://lilypondblog.org/category/comparisons/> >>>> >>>> Other list members here may have more recent references or info. >>> >>> I think it's always a bit of a squeeze to compare LilyPond with other >>> programs, particularly in the "challenges" department since the >>> challenge is often more to the user than to the program, LilyPond being >>> an open architecture with user-extensible functionality to a much larger >>> degree than other programs. >>> >>> So a particularly user may set a checkmark "yes, can do" while this does >>> not actually hold for a typical user without asking on the mailing list. >>> >>> -- >>> David Kastrup >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lilypond-user mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > -- J Martin Rushton MBCS
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
