Thanks for the explanations!
Your idea is good. The infrastructure is not there. We probably should
have something like make-translator for stuff that just translates
events and/or meddles with context properties.
So you probably need to work on the music expressions for now similar to
how articulate.ly does things.
Just so I understand correctly: I shouldn't use an engraver at all but
write a music function? And if I understood everything correctly to this
point, this is more difficult since at the time a music function is
interpreted, the actual position in time of the music in question is not
yet known.
So, it might be a bit involved here since what I'm doing is inherently
non-local (in contrast to, as far as I can see, \articulate): I think I
would have to keep track of time signature changes, do some book-keeping
on note lengths to know when a measure is complete, and so on. This
seems certainly possible, and ... well ... let's say, it certainly is
another opportunity to increase my understanding of Scheme and Lilypond. :-)
Lukas
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
