However, the web site _should_ say 2.5.0, not 2.5.9. I've fixed this.
Kieren, you may find the experimental CVS to be of interest, and bug reports
about it would be great, but for production use definitely stay with 2.4.2.
- Graham
On 17-Feb-05, at 12:52 PM, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
See http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2005-02/msg00262.html
/Mats
Kieren Richard MacMillan wrote:
Hello, all!
Finally back (after a long hiatus from beyond-the-Pond), and fink updated my unstable install. But the version now listed is 2.5.0, not 2.5.9 as indicated on the website -- is that expected?
Thanks, Kieren.
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
