On 26/02/2019 12:16, Karlin High wrote: > On 2/26/2019 5:48 AM, Urs Liska wrote: >> Most questions can conveniently and more efficiently be discussed on >> lilypond-user while for most of the remaining Frescobaldi-specific >> questions the issue tracker on Github seems appropriate and sufficient >> anyway. > > And Frescobaldi's not the only related project discussed here. > OpenLilyLib, lyluatex, whatever-other-TeX, editors like vi and EMACS, > in-browser editors like lilybin.com and HackLily, PDF software, MIDI > software, and still other things are also known to show up. I guess to > me this list seems more like discussion for "LilyPond ecosystem" than > strictly LilyPond. > > Of course, if strictly-LilyPond discussion starts getting crowded out > somehow, maybe that should change. But I think it's reasonable to start > discussions here for most any form of LilyPond usage, and then take it > to a specific project's discussion forum or issue tracker when it > narrows to that project.
Discussing other projects which fall into the Lilypond orbit can be a major service to readers. I only found out about Frescobaldi through this list a few years ago. I discovered today that there is a Google group so, if that is typical, banning all discussion would leave some users at best unsupported, and at worst ignorant. -- J Martin Rushton MBCS
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user