Andrew Bernard <[email protected]> writes: > Hi Aaron, > > Thank you for looking into this. As mentioned in my original post, I am not > using a Dynamics context as this New Complexity score is very, very complex > rhythmically, and it would tale a month to go back and figure out all the > spacer rests to use a dynamics context. I'd rather not do that, but I can > see where this is going.
You can just use the same content but remove the pertinent engravers for dynamics in your main staves and just use the dynamics-relevant engravers in the dynamics staff. > This was all fine until the score reached a certain number of pages. I > suppose I can go chopping pages out to see what may be going on > there. I tried 2.19.82 and 2.19.83, so I don't think there is an issue > with the version. > > I mention again that this started happening as the score grew large, > making me think there is some kind of memory management issue lurking > around. I am completely unable to prove this. That may well be, and using a Dynamics context is likely to change behavior (whether for the better or the worse is a matter of luck, but if you start out bad, where else would you have to go?) since it is an invasive restructuring of content. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
