On Thu, 9 May 2019 at 21:32, David Wright <lily...@lionunicorn.co.uk> wrote:

> On Thu 09 May 2019 at 20:20:36 (+0200), David Kastrup wrote:
> > Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> writes:
> >
> > > I saw the discussion about fixed vs relative few times in the lilypond
> ml.
> > >
> > > I think it's a lot about personal taste and habit and personally I
> decided
> > > to stick to fixed mainly because I find fixing mistakes in relative
> mode is
> > > much more annoying than writing in fixed way....
> > >
> > > But what if the editor would help a bit? What if you enter music in
> > > relative mode (don't worrying to specify the octave) but your editor
> would
> > > propose the "correct" (nearest) octave to add?
> > >
> > > For example suppose your cursor is immediatly after
> > >
> > > b'
> > >
> > >
> > > and then you type
> > >
> > > c
> > >
> > >
> > > What if the editor proposes to autocomplete with '' ?
> > >
> > > This is just an idea.
> >
> > You know that Frescobaldi can convert absolute to relative and vice
> versa?
>
> As can the   ly   standalone (derived from F~ possibly).
>

Sorry I don't understand.


> But if you can coerce an editor into doing this trick, I would suggest
> that absolute is a better target than fixed. Perhaps you meant that anyway.
>

What's the difference? I was thinking they were synonimus in lilypond
talking.


> However, there may be a downside. With relative, a wrong decision on
> one note has a dramatic effect on the following music, but is easily
> corrected with one tick. When this trick has been applied, many
> notes may have to be individually tickled after the mistake is
> discovered.
>

Maybe you're right. Or maybe the fact to see clearly what the editor
propose you (for each note) make you very self conscious of what you write.

Generally I appreciate the autocomplete feature even if I found it making
my though less fluent (but maybe it's better :))
g.





> Cheers,
> David.
>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to