On 19/05/19 02:08, Andrew Bernard wrote: > Why not just use markup for 'fine'? Position it as you wiil.
Because it doesn't make sense to use markup? It's a lot easier to position something, if it's attached to its reference object. Otherwise a minor change to the score will mess things up nicely! In a different context, I hit this regularly with tempi at rehearsal marks - because I separate layout from notes and re-use layout across several parts, it's a nightmare when I have to use markup and attach things to spacer rests, when I'd much rather attach multiple items to the bar line. This usually manifests itself in staircase markups just when I'm struggling to cram as much music as possible into as small a space as possible .. Cheers, Wol > > Andrew > > > On Sun, 19 May 2019 at 03:15, Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com > <mailto:gianmarial...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > I'm often in this situation: > > \version "2.21.0" > fine = { > \once \override Score.RehearsalMark #'break-visibility = > #'#(#t #t #f) > \once \override Score.RehearsalMark #'self-alignment-X = #RIGHT > \mark \markup \italic "Fine" > } > > \fixed c' { > c d e f \bar "|." \fine \break > \mark A c c c c > } > > > So, I would like the text "Fine" at the end of the first measure > (and in this case at the end of the line) and the rehearsal mark "A" > at the beginning of the next measure (and in this case at the > beginning of the second line). > > > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user