Am 03.07.19 um 05:54 schrieb Evan Driscoll:
I've got a couple measures that I'm struggling to even figure out what I
want the result from Lilypond to be. I've pasted the snippet below. As
picky connoisseurs of good notation, I'm wondering what other people
would do or like to see. :-) I'm leaning toward the second option but am
uncertain.
Important question: What instrument(s) will play this? Is this from a
part or a full score?
{ s4^"The default, but melody 'lost' in the other visual noise" }
Looks fine IMO.
{ s4^"I like this more but is forcing the stems departing too much
from standard practice?" }
This needs too much space on the lower side. IMO that departs too much.
{ s4^"This also works well but this is an area already with tons of
clef changes and this adds two more"}
What instrument(s) is this for? Piano/harp/violin(s)/…: NO! They don’t
know that clef. Bassoons/cello(s): Yes, use treble clef only if really
necessary (in most cases); either this or the first solution is fine.
Trombones: YES! AFAIK they don’t know treble clef.
r4^"I don't like this but for completeness..."
Piano? → depends on whether this should be played with one (big) or two
hands. Two instruments/divisi: Maybe better than the first solution. One
or unisonon violins: the first solution is better.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
