On 10/30/19, 11:48 AM, "Karsten Reincke" <k.rein...@fodina.de> wrote:
<snip>
2) Your polemic attack is wrong and unfair. If you had read my posts
carefully,
you would know [and probably you know it, but withhold this aspect], that I
offered URS already the opportunity to integrate my coming lib - licensed
under
the MIT license - into his OpenLIlyLib. I only refused and refuse to use
any GPL
licensed Lilypond snippet as 'module' / 'lib' for my own work.
I am curious as to why you feel you cannot use any GPL licensed LilyPond
snippet but you can use the GPL licensed lilypond itself. What about a snippet
makes it more invasive in terms of the GPL than the original program? I don't
understand.
Carl
