Peter Toye <lilyp...@ptoye.com> writes: > David and others, > > It seems that I've opened up a larger can of worms than I'd expected! > Thanks to all for the suggestions and clarifications. > > From what you say Quartet_No.I_Éloge_MovementI-ViolinI is a valid > variable name - just checking that this is correct.
No, it isn't. Quartet_No is a valid variable name, and I_Éloge_MovementI-ViolinI is a valid variable name. The dot in the middle is not part of a variable name, and I have no idea what makes you think it is from what has been said. > But also (from Aaron Hill's email) so is > "Quartet_No.1_Éloge_Movement1-Violin1" (The quotes being part of the > variable definitions and use, not part of the name). Pretty much so. -- David Kastrup
