On 2019-11-08 10:00 am, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote:
Hi,
In the Emmentaler font, the "G.clef" Unicode value is: U+e17b.
However, after Unicode hexadecimal values being entered, it shows
another
glyph:
\version "2.19.83"
\markuplist {
\line {
\italic "Unicode" \typewriter "U+e17b" \italic "shows" \typewriter
"clefs.tenorG_change:"
\override #'(font-name . "emmentaler-20") \char ##xe17b
}
\line {
\italic "Unicode" \typewriter "U+e176" \italic "shows" \typewriter
"clefs.G:"
\override #'(font-name . "emmentaler-20") \char ##xe176
}
}
Any reason why?
Your initial assertion regarding the codepoint would appear to no longer
be correct based on the version of the font I have:
%%%%
\version "2.19.83"
#(format #t "~:{\n~a = ##x~x~}"
(let ((font (ly:system-font-load "emmentaler-20")))
(map (lambda (x)
(list x (ly:font-glyph-name-to-charcode font x)))
'("clefs.G" "clefs.tenorG_change"))))
%%%%
====
GNU LilyPond 2.19.83
Processing `glyphname.ly'
Parsing...
clefs.G = ##xe176
clefs.tenorG_change = ##xe17b
Success: compilation successfully completed
====
Consider using \musicglyph to look up a glyph by name instead of futzing
with codepoints.
-- Aaron Hill
