Am Sa., 7. Dez. 2019 um 10:38 Uhr schrieb Werner LEMBERG <[email protected]>: > > > > Now in LSR > > lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=1099 > > Thanks a lot! Is there something that should be changed in LilyPond > to make it simpler to achieve this result? If yes, please open an > issue. > > > Werner
Well, I've tagged it as the workaround it is... Per default the stencil-procedure constructs the arpeggio using (multiple) "scripts.arpeggio" and probably "scripts.arpeggio.arrow.1" or "scripts.arpeggio.arrow.M1" Ofcourse all with the same fontsize otherwise we'd risk optical mismatches (and thus the new LSR-snippet fails if the arrow is scaled up too much). I don't see how we could do it simpler unless we'd provide different sized arrows for arpeggio. Then we could think of how a suitable user-interface to exchange those arrows might be coded. Worth an issue? Cheers, Harm
