Thank you David and Aaron! Based on your responses I've created this example: %%%% \version "2.19.83"
\paper { indent = 0 } butNotDots = \revert Dots.transparent musica = \relative c''{ f4 g << { \hideNotes a4.( \unHideNotes g8) } \\ { a4.( g8) } >> } musicb = \relative c''{ f4 g << { a4.( g8) } \\ { a4.( g8) } >> } musicc = \relative c''{ f4 g << { \stemDown a4.( \stemUp g8) } \\ { \hideNotes a4.( \unHideNotes g8) } >> } musicd = \relative c''{ f4 g << { \hideNotes \butNotDots a4.( \unHideNotes g8) } \\ { a4.( g8) } >> } \markup "a) initial code; hiding voiceOne" \score { \musica } \markup "b) no hiding voices" \score { \musicb } \markup "c) hiding voiceTwo and adjusting stems of voiceOne" \score { \musicc } \markup "d) hiding voiceTwo and keeping Dots" \score { \musicd } %%%% Both c) and d) seem to do what I want. Besides personal taste: Is there a reason to prefer one over the other? My gut feeling opts for d) as that provides proper stem direction when the music is transposed. Kind regards, Michael -- Michael Gerdau email: m...@qata.de GPG-keys available on request or at public keyserver
hidden-dotted.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
\version "2.19.83" \paper { indent = 0 } butNotDots = \revert Dots.transparent musica = \relative c''{ f4 g << { \hideNotes a4.( \unHideNotes g8) } \\ { a4.( g8) } >> } musicb = \relative c''{ f4 g << { a4.( g8) } \\ { a4.( g8) } >> } musicc = \relative c''{ f4 g << { \stemDown a4.( \stemUp g8) } \\ { \hideNotes a4.( \unHideNotes g8) } >> } musicd = \relative c''{ f4 g << { \hideNotes \butNotDots a4.( \unHideNotes g8) } \\ { a4.( g8) } >> } \markup "a) initial code; hiding voiceOne" \score { \musica } \markup "b) no hiding voices" \score { \musicb } \markup "c) hiding voiceTwo and adjusting stems of voiceOne" \score { \musicc } \markup "d) hiding voiceTwo and keeping Dots" \score { \musicd }