Thank you David and Aaron! Based on your responses I've created this example: %%%% \version "2.19.83"
\paper { indent = 0 }
butNotDots = \revert Dots.transparent
musica = \relative c''{ f4 g << { \hideNotes a4.( \unHideNotes g8) } \\ { a4.(
g8) } >> }
musicb = \relative c''{ f4 g << { a4.( g8) } \\ { a4.( g8) } >> }
musicc = \relative c''{ f4 g << { \stemDown a4.( \stemUp g8) } \\ { \hideNotes
a4.( \unHideNotes g8) } >> }
musicd = \relative c''{ f4 g << { \hideNotes \butNotDots a4.( \unHideNotes g8)
} \\ { a4.( g8) } >> }
\markup "a) initial code; hiding voiceOne"
\score {
\musica
}
\markup "b) no hiding voices"
\score {
\musicb
}
\markup "c) hiding voiceTwo and adjusting stems of voiceOne"
\score {
\musicc
}
\markup "d) hiding voiceTwo and keeping Dots"
\score {
\musicd
}
%%%%
Both c) and d) seem to do what I want. Besides personal taste:
Is there a reason to prefer one over the other?
My gut feeling opts for d) as that provides proper stem direction when the
music is transposed.
Kind regards,
Michael
--
Michael Gerdau email: [email protected]
GPG-keys available on request or at public keyserver
hidden-dotted.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
\version "2.19.83"
\paper { indent = 0 }
butNotDots = \revert Dots.transparent
musica = \relative c''{ f4 g << { \hideNotes a4.( \unHideNotes g8) } \\ { a4.( g8) } >> }
musicb = \relative c''{ f4 g << { a4.( g8) } \\ { a4.( g8) } >> }
musicc = \relative c''{ f4 g << { \stemDown a4.( \stemUp g8) } \\ { \hideNotes a4.( \unHideNotes g8) } >> }
musicd = \relative c''{ f4 g << { \hideNotes \butNotDots a4.( \unHideNotes g8) } \\ { a4.( g8) } >> }
\markup "a) initial code; hiding voiceOne"
\score {
\musica
}
\markup "b) no hiding voices"
\score {
\musicb
}
\markup "c) hiding voiceTwo and adjusting stems of voiceOne"
\score {
\musicc
}
\markup "d) hiding voiceTwo and keeping Dots"
\score {
\musicd
}
