On 02/22, Urs Liska wrote: > Am Freitag, den 21.02.2020, 18:52 -0800 schrieb ma...@masonhock.com: > > Do you want something similar [Sphinx][1] or [Doxygen][2]? > > Yes, something similar, but IISC these tools (which I had of course > taken notice of earlier) are limited to their set of languages.
Yes, that's right. I wasn't recommending those tools, just confirming that you are looking for something similar. > Craig Dabelstein did some research and suggested NaturalDocs ( > https://www.naturaldocs.org/) which looks nice and suitably > extensible/configurable for our purpose. I'm a little bit wary about > the fact that it's a project with a single contributor, and I know what > I'm talking about ... > (also I *think* it would be good to have a Python-based tool because it > might be easier to extend and to integrate with the other stuff. > > > Are the > > source files in Scheme, Lilypond, or a combination of both? > > Of course both. > The end-user interface is usually LilyPond, but the functionality is > all LilyPond, Scheme-in-LilyPond, and Scheme-in-Scheme-files. Huh. I thought it would be easier to find a good documentation generator for Scheme, but after searching for a while everything I found appears to have gone unmaintained for at least a few years (which I'm guessing is what you're afraid could happen with NaturalDocs?), and other than NaturalDocs I couldn't find anything that supports configuration for arbitrary languages.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
