Павел <budanov.pa...@gmail.com> writes: > 07.06.2020 14:16, Павел пишет: >> Thank you for deep explanation! >> >> Yes, this is complicated way but it can be useful in some cases. >> >> 07.06.2020 12:25, David Kastrup пишет: >>> Павел <budanov.pa...@gmail.com> writes: >>> >>>> See these two examples. They are almost same except angle brackets. In >>>> first example slur behaves correctly, but in second does not. >>>> >>>> \version "2.20.0" >>>> { >>>> \new Voice = "first" { g'8 f'( } >>>> \context Voice = "first" << <e')>4 <b b'> >> >>>> \new Voice = "second" { g'8 f'( } >>>> \context Voice = "second" << e'4) <b b'> >> >>>> } >>> I disagree with that assessment. Yours is just a complicated way of >>> writing >>> >>> \version "2.20.0" >>> { >>> \new Voice = "first" { g'8 f'( <e') b b'>4 } >>> \new Voice = "second" { g'8 f'( <e' b b'>4) } >>> } >>> >>> << >> places constructs in parallel, here into the same Voice. The >>> first line uses an in-chord slur ending which is drawn to a specific >>> note head, the second line uses a per-Voice slur ending which is drawn >>> to the whole chord. e'4) is essentially the same as <e'>4) . >>>
> Small clause: you said "e'4) is essentially the same as <e'>4)". But > according to your explanation it is essentially the different as > <e'>4), but in most practical cases they behave same. > While I am unsure that I guess your meaning correctly from this somewhat jumbled sentence, I repeat: e'4) is essentially the same as <e'>4) which is different from <e')>4 -- David Kastrup