On Tue, 16 Jun, 2020 at 14:54, Noeck <[email protected]> wrote:
Am 16.06.20 um 14:13 schrieb Federico Bruni:
IMO Frescobaldi package should not have lilypond as dependency
To be more precise: frescobaldi "recommends" and "enhances" lilypond.
But with default apt settings that means, installing frescobaldi will
install lilypond, too.
"recommends" makes sense, absolutely.
In Fedora there's the concept of weak dependency, but I think it was
introduced a few years ago.
Currently in Fedora lilypond is a hard dependency of frescobaldi:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/frescobaldi/blob/master/f/frescobaldi.spec#_23
I think I opened an issue in Fedora/Red Hat tracker some time ago, but
I cannot find it anymore.
