Hey all, because of the absence of lilyglyphs in ubuntu 20.04 packages, I downloaded it from git, moved the extracted folder to: ~/texmf/tex/latex/ renamed the fonts folder to lilyglyphs and moved it to: ~/texmf/fonts/opentype/ this resulted in: Package fontspec Error: The font "emmentaler-16" cannot be found...g}},
I guess the lilyglyphs package is working, but can't find the fonts. My question then is, which the correct path should be? I tried: ~/texmf/fonts/opentype/ ~/texmf/fonts/opentype/public/ (according to packages.ubunt.com that's the path used in usr/share/texlive/) ~/texmf/fonts/ Or do I have to modify some file in the lilyglyphs package and change the path to where it should look? Thanks, Bart https://esmiltania.be On Twitter <https://twitter.com/Bart_Issimo> On Google+ <https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/116379400376517483499/> Op do 2 jul. 2020 om 17:24 schreef bart deruyter <bart.deruy...@gmail.com>: > Thanks for looking into it. > > Indeed, I installed it using synaptic. > Browsing in the ubuntu packages on: > > https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=focal&arch=any&searchon=contents&keywords=lilyglyphs.sty > I don't find it either in 'focal', but I do find it in 'eoan'. > > https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=eoan&arch=any&searchon=contents&keywords=lilyglyphs.sty > There I read it should be in the texlive-music package. > Reading the description of 'texlive-music' in synaptic on my current > system (20.04 or focal) lilyglyphs.sty is not mentioned either. > > https://esmiltania.be > On Twitter <https://twitter.com/Bart_Issimo> > On Google+ <https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/116379400376517483499/> > > > Op do 2 jul. 2020 om 17:13 schreef Urs Liska <li...@openlilylib.org>: > >> Am Donnerstag, den 02.07.2020, 17:01 +0200 schrieb Urs Liska: >> > Am Donnerstag, den 02.07.2020, 10:18 +0200 schrieb Urs Liska: >> > > Am 2. Juli 2020 10:00:25 MESZ schrieb bart deruyter < >> > > bart.deruy...@gmail.com>: >> > > > Hi all, >> > > > a bit off topic, but I thought maybe here someone would know >> > > > something. >> > > > I've recently upgraded to ubuntu 20.04 and tried to compile a >> > > > luatex >> > > > file >> > > > containing lilypond material, using lyluatex and lilyglyphs. >> > > > >> > > > Now my system complains about 'lilyglyphs.sty not found'. >> > > > I thought it would have been upgraded too, but it seems like it >> > > > has >> > > > been >> > > > removed from the system and repositories all together. I don't >> > > > find >> > > > anything related to lilyglyphs in the repository. >> > > >> > > Thanks for the report. I don't know anything about it and will >> > > investigate. >> > >> > How did you install LaTeX? I assume you are using TeX Live? The >> > versions from the Ubuntu packages or the downloaded TeX Live? >> > >> > I assume you installed from the Ubuntu packages. If so, which actual >> > packages did you install. >> > https://packages.ubuntu.com/focal/all/texlive-music/filelist >> > indicates >> > lilyglyphs is (still) in the texlive-music collection. >> > >> > Actually I'd be surprised if they had removed it. I'm aware of the >> > possibility of compatibility issues, but I can't imagine they remove >> > packages without warning/asking the maintainers first. >> >> I just had a closer look and found that >> a) lilyglyphs.sty is (now?) placed at tex/lualatex/lilyglyphs >> which is somewhat strange and might xelatex not find it (I'm not sure, >> but if you use lyluatex this can't be the issue anyway. >> >> b) >> I can't find lilyglyphs in the texlive package lists of Ubuntu and >> Debian. I'll ask on the texlive mailing list. >> >> Urs >> >> > >> > BestUrs >> > >> > > Urs >> > > >> > > > thanks, >> > > > Bart >> > > > >> > > > https://esmiltania.be >> > > > On Twitter <https://twitter.com/Bart_Issimo> >> > > > On Google+ <https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/116379400376517483499/> >> > >> > >> >>
