\reshape is nice! I would try to make it clear in the documentation, if \reshape is included in the core, that \shape is the legacy form to be eventually deprecated and replaced by \reshape. Syntactically, it makes no sense to have both functions available for the same thing. If there could be a way to simply replace \shape with \shapeII / \reshape, it would be even better.
PS: \shapeII is already part of the project I’m working on. I always wondered if there could be a shorthand for \shape. I’m glad I could finally figure out today how to clone all the Github OLL repositories! www.martinrinconbotero.com On 6. Oct 2020, 18:44 +0200, Karlin High <karlinh...@gmail.com>, wrote: > On 10/6/2020 11:23 AM, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > > > \reshape ? > > Dude… nice work. =) > > Made me smile, too. I think that's approaching the perfect amount of > self-reference humor, without crossing the line to guaranteed obscurity > for newcomers. > -- > Karlin High > Missouri, USA >
