Jonas Hahnfeld <[email protected]> writes: > Am Sonntag, dem 24.01.2021 um 16:52 +0100 schrieb David Kastrup: >> Jonas Hahnfeld <[email protected]> writes: >> >> > Am Sonntag, dem 24.01.2021 um 00:54 +0100 schrieb Valentin Petzel: >> > > Hello, >> > > >> > > Lilypond transitioned to guile 2. >> > >> > No, it didn't. The default and only supported version right now is >> > Guile 1.8 and that's what is shipped in the official binary releases. >> > If your distribution provides you with LilyPond compiled against Guile >> > 2.2, file a bug with them (I know that at least Fedora 33 and Debian >> > sid do at the time of writing). >> >> Sure about Debian sid? They used to include a private version of >> libguile-1.8 inside. I have no idea why they would have changed that. > > They did for 2.22.0, see > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/lilypond/-/commit/c1a0c9179857599fc495d93f6d7579b64bd127b6
Anybody contacted him or anyone else responsible here for saying that this is a really, really, bad idea? It is probably a result of our configuration procedure not requiring hoops to jump through for going to Guile-2+ anymore: that spreads the impression that this is a desirable configuration. -- David Kastrup
