Hi David,
perhaps by giving a minimal example of the particular situation you have, where
you feel a “tied rest” is the best possible solution, other people could give
you better approaches.
> My software does create rests, it's just in the particular situation
> where a voice in one staff (like in a piano) has a quarter tied to a
> 16th that I need the same voice in the other staff to create the
> appropriate rests (quarter followed by a 16th).
I still don’t understand why having one voice such as {c4 ~ c16 c8.} can’t be
“translated” to a second voice that “creates the appropriate rests“ producing
something like {r4 r16 r8.} with no tie, or rather, why isn’t something like
this the first approach for your software. It seems we’re all on this list
missing something about the way you’re working with your software to be able to
help.
Cheers,
Martín.
www.martinrinconbotero.com
On 22. Feb 2021, 21:50 +0100, David Bellows <[email protected]>, wrote:
>
> that
