Am Mo., 27. Sept. 2021 um 17:05 Uhr schrieb Ivanov Dmitry <[email protected]>: > > Something is not right. I installed lilypond 2.23.3 and processed > hello2.xml. I still have an incorrect result. > > Here is what I do and what I get: > > $ musicxml2ly ./hello2.xml > musicxml2ly: Reading MusicXML from ./hello2.xml ... > musicxml2ly: Converting to LilyPond expressions... > musicxml2ly: warning: Negative skip -1/2 (from position 1/2 to 0) > musicxml2ly: Output to `hello2.ly' > musicxml2ly: Converting to current version (2.23.3) notations ... > > $ lilypond ./hello2.ly > GNU LilyPond 2.23.3 > Fontconfig warning: > "/etc/fonts/conf.avail/66-wqy-zenhei-sharp-no13px.conf", line 11: Having > multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not work as expected > Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.avail/66-wqy-zenhei-sharp.conf", > line 10: Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not > work as expected > Processing `./hello2.ly' > Parsing... > Interpreting music... > ./hello2.ly:15:13: warning: cannot find context to change to: Staff = 2 > <c d,>2 > \change Staff="2" } > Preprocessing graphical objects... > Finding the ideal number of pages... > Fitting music on 1 page... > Drawing systems... > Converting to `hello2.pdf'... > Success: compilation successfully completed > > Can someone try to process hello2.xml and attach .ly and .pdf files he > gets?
Hi, did you read Jacques' reply? https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2021-09/msg00480.html I can confirm this. Likely there's a bug in musicxml2ly. Thus, you could try Jacques' xml2ly, otoh my own recent test showed that xml2ly is not perfect either ... Cheers, Harm
