Well, the notation already violates the idea of two voices. That said,
I managed to generate similar output using only two voices like this:
\new Staff = "guitar traditional"
<<
\clef "treble_8"
\time 3/8
\key e \minor
% \mergeDifferentlyHeadedOn
% \mergeDifferentlyDottedOn
\context Voice = "high" \relative c' { \voiceOne d4*1/2-3 \voiceTwo
d,4 | }
\context Voice = "mid" \relative c' { \voiceTwo d8[ \voiceOne d,] b' |
}
>>
But note that the first note would not be full length in a midi
rendition.
Paul
On 05/10/2021 14:20:17, "Omid Mo'menzadeh" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>Hi all,
>The photo I attached is from Fernando Sor's "A la bonne heure"
><https://imslp.org/wiki/Special:ReverseLookup/470303> (No. 1), which I
>am engraving using Lilypond for a readable score. The following is how
>I did it, which certainly looks similar to the original photo:
>
>\version "2.22.1"
>
>\new Staff = "guitar traditional" <<
> \clef "treble_8"
> \time 3/8
> \key e \minor
> \mergeDifferentlyHeadedOn
> \mergeDifferentlyDottedOn
> \context Voice = "high" \relative c' { \voiceOne d4-3 b8 | }
> \context Voice = "mid" \relative c' { \voiceTwo d8 \voiceThree d, s |
>}
> \context Voice = "low" \relative c {\voiceTwo s8 d4 | }
> >>
>
>What makes me doubt this solution is that any other measure in the
>piece uses two voices, except the ones looking like this! Is there a
>cleaner way to do this, possibly using two voices? Am I reading the
>score correctly?
>Thanks in advance,
>Omid Momenzadeh
