Well, that's good news, since it would make fixing the problem a lot
easier. Here is my output from "ping lilypond.org", which definitely is
trying to get something from Google:
PING lilypond.org (35.206.114.173) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 173.114.206.35.bc.googleusercontent.com (35.206.114.173):
icmp_seq=1 ttl=99 time=312 ms
64 bytes from 173.114.206.35.bc.googleusercontent.com (35.206.114.173):
icmp_seq=2 ttl=96 time=279 ms
64 bytes from 173.114.206.35.bc.googleusercontent.com (35.206.114.173):
icmp_seq=3 ttl=99 time=339 ms
64 bytes from 173.114.206.35.bc.googleusercontent.com (35.206.114.173):
icmp_seq=4 ttl=96 time=310 ms
64 bytes from 173.114.206.35.bc.googleusercontent.com (35.206.114.173):
icmp_seq=5 ttl=96 time=311 ms

On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 5:13 PM Phil Holmes <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 02/11/2021 12:53, Kevin Cole wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 6:42 AM Omid Mo'menzadeh <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello all.
>> I'm not sure if this is the right list to post this, but I'll give it a
>> shot here, and see where I should report this.
>> The problem seems to be the website's hosting, which appears to be
>> provided by Google, which blocks access from certain countries in
>> accordance with US law (with the error message "403. That’s an error. Your
>> client does not have permission to get URL / from this server. That’s all
>> we know."). This would not surprise me if LilyPond was not a GNU project,
>> but it's a bit off at the moment, to say the least.
>> What I would want to know if this is something the team cares about, and
>> where I should discuss this.
>> Thanks,
>> Omid Momenzadeh
>>
> I could  be mistaken -- I often am -- but...
>
> I suspect it's merely that the site is designed to construct search
> queries using Google as the default search engine -- along with Google's
> option to limit the search to a particular site. This saves the maintainers
> from having to install a search engine and keep it updated.
>
> (One other negative consequence of this setup is that it randomly chooses
> the version of documentation -- e.g. If I am on a .../doc/v2.20/... page
> and search for a term, it will happily offer up a match from
> .../doc/v2.22/..., .../doc/2.18/... or whatever else it finds.)
>
> No - it's hosted on Google currently.
>
> --
>
> Phil Holmes
>

Reply via email to