For comparison: My iMac late 2013 Intel i5 3,2 GHz 8 GM RAM needs 27.4“ Both macOS Monterey 12.0.1 btw
> Am 02.12.2021 um 09:05 schrieb Thomas Scharkowski <[email protected]>: > > Hi, > > the Carver takes 10.6“ to compile on my MacBook Pro M1 16GB RAM with LilyPond > 2.23.5 > > Hth > > >> Am 02.12.2021 um 02:55 schrieb Paolo Prete <[email protected]>: >> >> Note too that there's a list of the results for the Gzip test: >> >> https://openbenchmarking.org/test/pts/compress-gzip >> >> From this list it appears to me that Intel Core i5-11600k could be the >> "gold" PC for LilyPond... >> >> On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 2:41 AM Paolo Prete <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hello Hans, >> >> I don't think this test can give reliable results for what we need to >> compare. >> With my processor (Intel Celeron N3350) it took 96 seconds to compile >> MSDN.ly >> >> But my CPU is listed with score 287: >> https://browser.geekbench.com/processors/intel-celeron-n3350 >> ---> (1712 / 287) >> >> From what I see, is it true that geekbench 5 is single core, but it >> intensively uses RAM and the test we need should not be focused on RAM. I >> would consider a Gzip compression test, instead. >> >> https://openbenchmarking.org/vs/Processor/Apple%20M1,Intel%20Celeron%20J3455 >> >> (note that it compares Apple M1 with Celeron J3455, which is NOT my CPU, but >> it should be very similar for single-core tests.) >> >> The result is 91 / 40 which is very similar to 96 seconds / 40 seconds >> (Jacque's test) . I don't know if this is a coincidence and please, if you >> all have more data, share it. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 5:56 PM Hans Åberg <[email protected]> wrote: >> So, to illustrate the idea of using the benchmark at the list below, it >> might be the Mac mini (Late 2020) with single-core score 1712 and the other >> Macs of this year have a similar performance. It gives for the iMac 2008 >> used a single-core score 372 (depending on model), and it took 4–5 minutes >> to compile the same example. Then 1712/407 = 4.6, and dividing 4 minutes >> with that gives 53 seconds, and this ignores speedups in lilypond self, but >> it seems one can get a rough idea of performance this way. >> >> https://browser.geekbench.com/mac-benchmarks >> >> >>> On 30 Nov 2021, at 16:36, Jacques Menu <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Here is what I get for this 102 page score: >>> >>> jacquesmenu@macmini > time lilypond MSDM.ly >>> GNU LilyPond 2.22.1 >>> ;;; note: auto-compilation is enabled, set GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0 >>> ;;; or pass the --no-auto-compile argument to disable. >>> … … … … >>> real 0m39.590s >>> user 0m37.119s >>> sys 0m2.285s >>> >>> jacquesmenu@macmini > ls -sal MSDM.* >>> 8 -rw-------@ 1 jacquesmenu staff 2695 Nov 17 2016 MSDM.ly >>> 88 -rw-r--r-- 1 jacquesmenu staff 42641 Nov 30 16:32 MSDM.mid >>> 1888 -rw-r--r-- 1 jacquesmenu staff 963019 Nov 30 16:32 MSDM.pdf >>> >>> The machine is a Mac Mini M1, 8GB RAM, 256 GB disk. >>> >>> JM >>> >>>> Le 30 nov. 2021 à 15:28, Hans Åberg <[email protected]> a écrit : >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 30 Nov 2021, at 14:26, Paolo Prete <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I need to buy a new PC, more powerful than the one I own. The CPU and RAM >>>>> must be chosen on the time required to produce LilyPond output. Are there >>>>> any test sheets with different CPUs and the time they take to output a >>>>> score that takes a long time to compile? In case this doesn't exist >>>>> specifically for LilyPond, is there anything equivalent I can use? >>>> >>>> There are general benchmarks, like those below, maybe the single core ones >>>> can be useful. >>>> >>>> https://browser.geekbench.com >>>> https://browser.geekbench.com/mac-benchmarks >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > >
