Hi Jean,
> Yes, I understand better, thanks.
I can give you uncountable examples of "sugar" being more powerful than just
about anything else that's visible in Lilypond. [We all know that sugar isn't
as powerful as the amazing code underneath… but for the purposes of
Lily-vangelizing, it's the input code that makes the most obvious and immediate
impact on newbies.]
A really big case is stylesheets: when I show people that changing the one line
(e.g.)
\include "musical/pianoconductor.ily"
to
\include "pub/HalLeonard.ily"
makes the same code/content file appear like two totally different
publications, you should see the look of awe and envy on the faces of Finale /
Sibelius / Dorico users. ;)
> I'd just suggest changing your snippet
I figured you'd have an improvement.
This isn't actually my snippet… but thanks for the tweak!
Best,
Kieren.
