Ah, mea culpa. www.martinrinconbotero.com
> > On Mar 29, 2022 at 12:58 PM, <David Kastrup (mailto:d...@gnu.org)> wrote: > > > > Martín Rincón Botero <martinrinconbot...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Since > TeX is predominantly employed for compiling LaTeX sources, that >> speaks > more about the LaTeX implementation than TeX itself. > > Because I'm > under the impression that Lilypond is more similar to > LaTeX than to TeX, > It totally isn't, neither in concept nor in execution. In my book, it would > benefit from a layer trying to abstract content and design in a manner like > LaTeX does, but LilyPond in common use does not have any such layer or > architecture as it stands. It's essentially employed like plain TeX, > explicitly cranking out stuff with thin individual user-convenience layers on > top. We don't have the equivalence of document classes, and no coherent > system of what amounts to LaTeX's package system. -- David Kastrup > >
