Or with \tweak. Thank you Jean! Wow, one of those historical bugs. Ay!
On abr. 29 2022, at 4:31 pm, Jean Abou Samra <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Le 29/04/2022 à 12:07, Martín Rincón Botero a écrit :
> > Dear list,
> >
> > consider:
> >
> > \version "2.22.1"
> >
> > {
> > d'2
> > \startTrillSpan
> > b2
> > \startTrillSpan
> > b1\stopTrillSpan
> > }
> >
> > Which produces:
> >
> > [image]
> > How can I bring both trills to be vertically aligned? (Compare the
> > example in the documentation which automatically engraves a similar
> > situation correctly:
> > https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.22/Documentation/notation/expressive-marks-as-lines#trills).
>
>
>
> This is a variant of this old issue:
> https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/923
> Basically, the problem is that trill spanner must be printed with an
> integer number of squiggles. Depending on the exact length of the
> first trill, its last squiggle may, or may not, overlap with the
> next trill, forcing the next trill to avoid it vertically.
>
> You can circumvent the problem with
> \version "2.22.1"
> {
> d'2\tweak bound-details.right.padding 2 \startTrillSpan
> b2\startTrillSpan
> b1\stopTrillSpan
> }
>
>
> Best,
> Jean
>
