No, there was a reason I needed the fingerings on either side of the staff
(in my use case, sometimes there is an alternate fingering).

Thanks,

On Thu, May 19, 2022, 10:00 Mark Stephen Mrotek <carsonm...@ca.rr.com>
wrote:

> Anahu,
>
>
>
> Is this acceptable?
>
>
>
> \version "2.22.2"
>
> \relative c
>
> {\tuplet 3/2 { g''8_4 g g } \tuplet 3/2 { c^4 c c } }
>
>
>
> Mark
>
>
>
> *From:* lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=
> ca.rr....@gnu.org] *On Behalf Of *Ahanu Banerjee
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 18, 2022 8:54 PM
> *To:* Lily Pond <lilypond-user@gnu.org>
> *Subject:* TupletNumber placement with fingering
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> When I have a beamed tuplet (without a bracket) and a fingering on one
> note, the TupletNumber moves outward from the staff despite there being no
> possibility of a collison. In normal usage, TupletNumber should stay as
> close as possible to the beam.
>
>
>
> Example:
>
>
>
> \version "2.22.2"
>
> \relative c
>
> {\tuplet 3/2 { g''8-4 g g } \tuplet 3/2 { c_4 c c } }
>
>
>
> Is this the expected behaviour? The fix I have found is increasing the
> value of Fingering.outside-staff-priority. Is that the best solution?
>
>
>
> Thank you!
>

Reply via email to