Am Mi., 6. Juli 2022 um 19:07 Uhr schrieb Jean Abou Samra <[email protected]>: > > > > On 7/5/22 01:10, Thomas Morley wrote: > > Am Di., 5. Juli 2022 um 00:34 Uhr schrieb Jean Abou Samra > > <[email protected]>: > > > > I just detected I can't compile my code with 2.22. any more, due to > > the internal changes in \repeat volta. > > Ofcourse it could have been any other change as well. > > Should I code for both lily-versions, just to get helpful error > > messages? Well, no, thanks. > > > >> We have a real problem here. > > You are a master of understatement. > > > > Does it help to use master, not byte-compiled? > > Could check myself, to tired now, though. > > > > Cheers, > > Harm > > > By the way: as a workaround, you can put your code in a .scm file > and load it with ly:load. Then run LilyPond with GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=1. >
Sorry for the delayed reply! I now tried to make some steps for scm-files/ly:load/autocompile. Though, as far as I can tell ly:load doesn't work with relative pathes. I'm attempting to code an extension to plain LilyPond. It needs a huge amount of scheme-coding. And ofcourse I will not know where the end-user may store it (once it is finished) Therefore ly:load is unusable. Thus debugging such huge code is a pain, it drains energy and motivation. Ok, I can use it for private coding, though that's not the goal. Cheers, Harm
