Eef Weenink <[email protected]> writes:

> :-) works fine. So if I understandn this correctly, inside a scheme
> part it is possible to insert lilypondinstructions like this:
>
> (scheme instructions #{ lilypondinstructions #}) 
>
> (that was not in the manual ;-)

<https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.22/Documentation/extending/lilypond-code-blocks>

-- 
David Kastrup

Reply via email to