Kieren MacMillan <[email protected]> writes: > Hi Jean, > >> Um, that is exactly the current default. And it is what makes >> >> \version "2.24.0" >> >> << >> \new Staff { \grace c'8 c'1 } >> \new Staff { >> \clef bass % zero-length => after graces >> c'1 >> } >> >> >> >> return output that most users are not expecting. > > In this case (as with so many!) the problem isn't moment-bleed, it's > context-bleed: the grace music doesn’t apply to the lower staff, and > thus shouldn’t be included in decision-making there; likewise, the > clef doesn’t apply to the upper staff, and so shouldn’t be included in > the decision-making there.
That's just wild hand-waving. You cannot let the second Staff start after the grace note. That would look like
> a.k.a. This still isn’t evidence that disproves my theory of how > things could/should work. A "theory" has hard rules. You haven't come up with any set of rules that would not either _mandate_ the behavior that constitutes issue 34 or would result in worse artifacts. Computer problems cannot be solved with linguistics, only with logic. -- David Kastrup
