On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 6:47 PM H. S. Teoh via LilyPond user discussion <
[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 07:08:41PM -0500, David Zelinsky wrote:
> > Kieren MacMillan <[email protected]> writes:
> >
> > > Hi Silvain,
> > >
> > >> I wonder about the term “irrational” meter. Should not we say
> > >> “irregular” ??  as in mathematics, an irrational number is a number
> > >> which cannot be represented as a fraction...
> > >
> > > As both a published composer *and* a published number theorist, I
> > > wholeheartedly concur with your intuition — I’ve been pushing for
> > > decades against “irrational” as a descriptor for time signatures
> > > [except where it actually applies, of course, as in π/4].
> > >
> > > “Irregular” is better… but ultimately I prefer “non-dyadic” to
> > > describe any time signature where the bottom number (a.k.a.
> > > “denominator”, a label I also avoid) is not an integer power of 2.
> [...]
> > As another professional number theorist and musician (though not a
> > composer), I also find this use of "irrational" to mean "non-dyadic"
> > very grating.  But I once said as much on the Music Engraving Tips
> > facebook group, and got summarily shot down as ignorant and elitist.
> > The argument, such as it was, held that this is about *music*, not
> > *mathematics*, so there's no reason to adopt mathematicians' quirky
> > terminology.  This left me rather speechless, so I gave up.  However,
> > if I ever have reason to discuss this type of meter, will always call
> > it "non-dyadic".
> [...]
>
> This is off-topic, but it would be interesting if somebody composed a
> piece with an actually irrational meter, like π/4 or 3/π.  Only thing
> is, it would be impossible for human performers to play correctly, since
> there isn't any way to count the beats correctly (counting beats implies
> a rational fraction, since by definition it's impossible to count up to
> an irrational ratio by counting finite parts).


Speaking of non-human performers, you’ll find examples in the player piano
studies of Conlon Nancarrow.

Best,
David

Reply via email to