Okay, I will create a MR these days. But just gotta point out: You yourself argued back then: \removeFontFeature sounds more like a specialized use case though. I'd add just \with-font-feature ...
Note that prefixing a feature to omit with an "-" is not a new syntax. It is done e.g. with fontspec in XeTeX and LuaTeX as well as for example LibreOffice. So I think this is not too unreasonable a syntax. Am Montag, 27. Februar 2023, 16:42:55 CET schrieb Jean Abou Samra: > > Le 27 févr. 2023 à 16:32, Valentin Petzel <[email protected]> a écrit : > > Would you think it would make sense to provide > > this (or a similar function) to Lilypond? > > Yes, I do. No need to invent syntax/convenience for less frequently used > stuff though (the cost of memorizing it outweighs the cost of typing more > verbose syntax if you use a feature rarely); just provide > \with-font-feature and \without-font-feature IMHO. Also, beware that > comparing characters with eq? gives undefined results (use eqv? instead).
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
