Bertalan Fodor writes:

> Yes, I did, because I built a 2.5.x cygwin version before. I think the
> native version is twice as fast as the Cygwin version. However, I don't
> have more precise comparison, but I'll build a cygwin version for 2.5
> (or 2.6), and we'll be able to compare.

Cool, then we can send another CYGWIN IS SLOW!!! email to the cygwin list ;-)

Jan.

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien       | http://www.lilypond.org


_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to