Le jeudi 20 juillet 2023 à 00:06 +0200, Jean Abou Samra a écrit : > There is definitely a point in having this rule that constants > are read-only. What I don't find fine is Guile segfaulting on > a simple set-car! call. I mean, either doing it silently or > checking and raising an exception would be OK, I don't really care > which that much. Just not plain nasal demons. This is Scheme code, > not C code.
For future reference, I dug up the corresponding bug reports in the Guile bug tracker: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=16060 and https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=58066
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
