If you don't specify that .map file and use this package, then
you will get bitmapped fonts, which doesn't really do any harm
as long as you print the scores on paper or view the Postscript
file without zooming in too much. However, if you view a PDF file
with bitmapped fonts on the screen, it will usually look terribly
fuzzy, which is why the vectorized fonts (Type1 fonts) in
ec-fonts-mftraced are used by default.
Maybe the information in
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2005-05/msg00207.html
can help you get further.
/Mats
Sterling Sympatico wrote:
Hi,
Mats... I think the fonts are installed as properly as can be in linux.
I did a 'dpkg-reconfigure ec-fonts-mftraced' and then ran 'texhash' for
good measure. All went fine. I still need to NOT specify the .map file
to have success. If I specify the map file, my output fonts look bad.
Thanks for the suggestion.
Sterling
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
=============================================
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
Signals, Sensors and Systems
Royal Institute of Technology
SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463
Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=============================================
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
