David, Thank you. That is exactly what I was looking for. William, thank you for the helpful explanation of the somewhat archaic use of the cut time sign. And David, again thank you for your responses.
-Stan > On Jan 11, 2024, at 9:20 PM, David Wright <lily...@lionunicorn.co.uk> wrote: > > On Thu 11 Jan 2024 at 20:11:54 (-0600), Stanton Sanderson wrote: >> >> Thank you for the suggestion, but as stated previously, I’m trying to >> reproduce the original from the Peters edition. The problem, as you point >> out, is that the cut C is used in the original. Whether 8/4 or 4/2 (and I >> agree that 4/2 is the most reasonable time signature), I was looking for a >> way of declaring the cut C. >> >> The included photo is from the piece (# 67. Vater Unser in Himmelreich by >> Johann Kyieger, from _80 Choral Preludes_, Edition Peters, No. 4440, >> Copyright 1947). I think I purchased it some time around 1959. > > You can override the glyph, as attached. > > Cheers, > David. > <42.ly><42.pdf>
