Thanks. That's fine. I guess it is a tribute to the extensibility and the rich infrastructure that I could pull out what I needed with just a few lines of code.
For what is worth, my use case was a frenched score with a double choir (each must be kept together independently) where at some point I'd like to temporarily allow to join both choirs into a single choir staff. Sort of like the divisi scenario, but with the added complexity of juggling full choir staves. Best regards Julián El sáb, 10 feb 2024 10:45, David Kastrup <[email protected]> escribió: > Julian Santander <[email protected]> writes: > > > For the record, I believe I finally solved all my problems (with this > > particular score). > > > > About the problem I asked in my previous e-mail. > > > > The way Keep_alive_together_engraver works with the "remove-layer" > property > > is confusing as it is used for two contradictory purposes removing layers > > and keeping layers and, in my case, I wanted to remove some layers but > keep > > others. > > For the record: remove-layer was designed as a low-level mechanism, not > a user interface. As such, the focus was on making it versatile, not > simple to use. > > But nobody has bothered defining particular use cases and giving them a > simple user interface. > > -- > David Kastrup >
