> On 10 Apr 2024, at 23:29, Carl Sorensen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 2:02 PM Hans Åberg <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> There is actually one example of a naturally occurring meter, meaning it is
>> used regularly, where such a sub-beaming might be useful, namely, a form of
>> the Čoček in 9/8, 9 = 2+2+2+3, where 3 = 1+2. I wrote it as 2+2+2+1+2, but
>> it would be nice to write it as 2+2+2+(1+2).
>>
>> If I write
>> \time 9/8
>> \set beatStructure = 2,2,2,3
>> \set subdivideBeams = ##t
>> then it ends up with all 2 = 1+1, and 3 = 1+1+1.
>>
>> So such examples may occur even if there is not a composer trying to do
>> something special.
>>
>> So in the following, I think I get what you call 2+2+2+3, but unfortunately
>> I don't get 3 = 1+2. Do you agree with this statement?
Correct.
>> I have made it a little better, because the 2 are all 2, but the three is
>> just 3 (not 1+2)
>>
>> \version "2.25.11"
>> {
>> \time 9/8
>> \set beatStructure = #'(2 2 2 3)
>> \set subdivideBeams = ##t
>> \set minimumBeamSubdivisionInterval = \musicLength 4
>> \repeat unfold 18 a'16
>> }
If I write
{
\time 9/8
\set beatStructure = #'(2 2 2 3)
\set subdivideBeams = ##t
\set minimumBeamSubdivisionInterval = \musicLength 8
\repeat unfold 18 a'16
}
then I get the sub-beams, but should only be applied to the last 3, and between
the first 1/8 and the last 2/8.
