> `wordwrap-string-internal` is one of only three > markup-(list)-commands flagged "internal" and thus not documented, > but it _is_ a full blown, ready-to-use command.
Should we change this to a public function?
Werner
> `wordwrap-string-internal` is one of only three > markup-(list)-commands flagged "internal" and thus not documented, > but it _is_ a full blown, ready-to-use command.
Should we change this to a public function?
Werner