[See thread starting at
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2026-01/msg00026.html]
> 2.12.-epsfile is different from the 2.25. version.
>
> 2.12.-epsfile internally calls the old `eps-file->stencil` seems to
> respect the bounding-box for the final stencil.
> 2.25.-epsfile internally calls the pretty new image-markup. There you
> can find the comment:
> ;; Stencil starts at (0, 0), even for an EPS image whose bounding
> ;; box does not start at (0, 0).
> I.e. whatever bounding-box is processed, it is translated to start a (0, 0)
>
> This feels like a design-decision. I've no clue about the reasoning
> and didn't investigate further.
Jean, can you please tell us your reasoning? I think we should
document this implementation difference – even we missed it that an
example in the documentation changed...
Werner
